Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coding guideline - Common rules"
(→Private member variables) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | == Private member variables<br> == |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ==== | + | ==='''I would like that we have _camelCase as allowed for this specific case. It makes it easier to see in code when people are using private variables, using this. or not'''=== |
| − | + | ||
| + | ''=> a section for naming private/protected member's fields has been added into 3.4.1'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''<U>Camel case preceding by an underscore '_' for private/protected fields:</U>'' | ||
| + | <FONT FACE="Courier New, monospace" SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt" COLOR="#000000"> | ||
| + | :<FONT COLOR="#0000ff">public </FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000ff">class </FONT><FONT COLOR="#2b91af"><U>SomeClass</U></FONT> | ||
| + | :{ | ||
| + | ::<FONT COLOR="#0000ff">private </FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000ff">int </FONT>''_number''; | ||
| + | ::<FONT COLOR="#0000ff">protected </FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000ff">string </FONT>''_name''; | ||
| + | :} | ||
| + | </FONT> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 9 December 2008
Private member variables
I would like that we have _camelCase as allowed for this specific case. It makes it easier to see in code when people are using private variables, using this. or not
=> a section for naming private/protected member's fields has been added into 3.4.1
Camel case preceding by an underscore '_' for private/protected fields:
- public class SomeClass
- {
- private int _number;
- protected string _name;
- }
